Beyond double-stranded RNA-type I IFN induction by 3pRNA and other viral nucleic acids

M Schlee, W Barchet, V Hornung… - Interferon: The 50th …, 2007 - Springer
Interferon: The 50th Anniversary, 2007Springer
Production of type I IFN is the key response to viral infection. Since the discovery of type I
IFNs in 1957, long double-stranded RNA formed during replication of many viruses was
thought to be responsible for type I IFN induction, and for decades double-stranded RNA-
activated protein kinase (PKR) was thought to be the receptor. Recently, this picture has
dramatically changed. It now became evident that not PKR but two members of the Toll-like
receptor (TLR) family, TLR7 and TLR9, and two cytosolic helicases, RIG-I and MDA-5, are …
Abstract
Production of type I IFN is the key response to viral infection. Since the discovery of type I IFNs in 1957, long double-stranded RNA formed during replication of many viruses was thought to be responsible for type I IFN induction, and for decades double-stranded RNA-activated protein kinase (PKR) was thought to be the receptor. Recently, this picture has dramatically changed. It now became evident that not PKR but two members of the Toll-like receptor (TLR) family, TLR7 and TLR9, and two cytosolic helicases, RIG-I and MDA-5, are responsible for the majority of type I IFNs induced upon recognition of viral nucleic acids. In this review, we focus on the molecular mechanisms by which those innate immune receptors detect viral infection. Based on the recent progress in the field, we now know that TLR7, TLR9, and RIG-I do not require long double-stranded RNA for type I IFN induction.
Springer