A randomized trial of intensive lipid-lowering therapy in calcific aortic stenosis

SJ Cowell, DE Newby, RJ Prescott… - … England Journal of …, 2005 - Mass Medical Soc
SJ Cowell, DE Newby, RJ Prescott, P Bloomfield, J Reid, DB Northridge, NA Boon
New England Journal of Medicine, 2005Mass Medical Soc
Background Calcific aortic stenosis has many characteristics in common with
atherosclerosis, including hypercholesterolemia. We hypothesized that intensive lipid-
lowering therapy would halt the progression of calcific aortic stenosis or induce its
regression. Methods In this double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, patients with calcific aortic
stenosis were randomly assigned to receive either 80 mg of atorvastatin daily or a matched
placebo. Aortic-valve stenosis and calcification were assessed with the use of Doppler …
Background
Calcific aortic stenosis has many characteristics in common with atherosclerosis, including hypercholesterolemia. We hypothesized that intensive lipid-lowering therapy would halt the progression of calcific aortic stenosis or induce its regression.
Methods
In this double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, patients with calcific aortic stenosis were randomly assigned to receive either 80 mg of atorvastatin daily or a matched placebo. Aortic-valve stenosis and calcification were assessed with the use of Doppler echocardiography and helical computed tomography, respectively. The primary end points were change in aortic-jet velocity and aortic-valve calcium score.
Results
Seventy-seven patients were assigned to atorvastatin and 78 to placebo, with a median follow-up of 25 months (range, 7 to 36). Serum low-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations remained at 130±30 mg per deciliter in the placebo group and fell to 63±23 mg per deciliter in the atorvastatin group (P<0.001). Increases in aortic-jet velocity were 0.199±0.210 m per second per year in the atorvastatin group and 0.203±0.208 m per second per year in the placebo group (P=0.95; adjusted mean difference, 0.002; 95 percent confidence interval, –0.066 to 0.070 m per second per year). Progression in valvular calcification was 22.3±21.0 percent per year in the atorvastatin group, and 21.7±19.8 percent per year in the placebo group (P=0.93; ratio of post-treatment aortic-valve calcium score, 0.998; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.947 to 1.050).
Conclusions
Intensive lipid-lowering therapy does not halt the progression of calcific aortic stenosis or induce its regression. This study cannot exclude a small reduction in the rate of disease progression or a significant reduction in major clinical end points. Long-term, large-scale, randomized, controlled trials are needed to establish the role of statin therapy in patients with calcific aortic stenosis.
The New England Journal Of Medicine